With code installed, an AI (opens in new tab) bot can crawl the site, find potential issues, and even offer solutions.
These are mostly functioning as a SaaS (opens in new tab) so that the software and process lives in the cloud, and the website team does not have to configure anything more complex than a simple line of code. This then enables the software of the web accessibility provider to get to work. Many start with the website installing a short portion of code provided by the web accessibility company onto the site. Most of these web accessibility providers can bring a site up to standards pretty quickly. Most smart businesses these days would rather comply with standards, rather than open themselves to endless litigation. However, the floodgates had already been opened to web accessibility lawsuits. Subsequently, the 11th Circuit Court ruled that the Title III standards of the ADA did in fact not apply to a website. This then opened the door to websites needing to comply with ADA standards. While Winn-Dixie argued that a website was not the same as a physical location, and therefore the same ADA standards did not apply, the district court ruled in favor of the plaintiff.
In this case, the plaintiff brought suit when the Winn-Dixie website was not fully available to this user when he attempted to add a digital coupon to his card, and refill a prescription. (opens in new tab), which established a precedent in this area. This goes back to 2017, with the District Court Case: Juan Carlos Gill v. Due to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) being applied to websites, this has become an increasingly important issue for website owners.
0 kommentar(er)
